Zcrosshair

Gaviota Beach Crime Scene Investigated  

Zcrosshair
DomingosJunioricon
EdwardsJunioricon
Zcrosshair
LeeGnesa2-icon
ShirleyGnesa-icon
Goviataheadlandsicon
Gaviotaproposedsiteicon
DSC02054-50%-icon
DSC02057-50%-icon
DSC02058-50%-icon
DSC02062-50%-icon
DSC02064-50%-icon
DSC02074-50%-icon
DSC04409-50%-icon
DSC04412-50%-icon
DSC04413-50%-icon
DSC04411-50%-icon
VdelMicon
2008secondpromontory-icon

     This is one of the most problematic crime scenes to put back together, not just in sequence of events on that tragic day but also to physically reconstruct today. No crime scene photos have been released. There is only a very general sketch of the topography, showing the stream, the clearing, the pathways and the itinerant bum’s shack. But as I write this, it is one month short of 50 years since this terrible double murder. The sketch doesn’t help much anymore. All the flora has grown like a jungle island; the stream has cut deep with the torrential runoff of floods since then. My experience at the scene today reminds me of those old documentaries where you are shown some old Marine base or aircraft wreck on a Pacific island during WWII and then are shown researchers visiting the site today. The difference is night and day. The open spaces and the reference points are all obscured by 50 years of growth. But I had 2 very stalwart companions leading the way. Bobby Domingos’ cousin, Brian Donelson, and the man who led police to the spot 50 years ago— Lee Gnesa. Without them it would have been impossible to have proceeded.

     Let’s flashback in order to put everything in context. It is June 4, 1963. Clean cut is the image. Frankie and Annette would debut in their first beach movie in a couple of months. Beach PartyKennedy was president. Kodachrome was becoming popular for photography. Black and White was still commonplace. The Beach Boys were a phenomenon, and America was fascinated with the new surfer craze.

     It was senior ditch day at Lompoc High. This was a tradition there. Graduation was only days away. Seniors would skip class and go on a trip together or in their own little groups.  Bobby Domingos and Linda Edwards didn’t want to go with the group to Goleta Beach. They wanted to go “hang out” (I think that was actually just a new term) together with a couple of friends. Shirley Gnesa and Linda were buddies. Shirley was soon to be married and Linda was to be a bridesmaid. Shirley, in turn, was going to be a bridesmaid at Linda’s wedding to Bobby in November.  Shirley’s beau, however, couldn’t go for the day, so Shirley backed out too.

     Bobby and Linda left Lompoc to go to the area that was fairly remote, but not inaccessible.  It is an area with no real name. But it is plain to see on any map that it is the largest promontory that juts out into the blue Pacific along the coast. It must have been 30 minutes from Lompoc, halfway to Santa Barbara.

   Back then cars could park on the two lane Highway 101 south. In the median between north and south lanes there was a clearing set back from the trees.  Here Bobby parked his distinctive 56 Pontiac (black and copper), they crossed the road, the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, and followed the path to the beach. The walk to the beach might be 8 DSC04406-50%-iconminutes or so depending on how quick they went down the game trail.  Surfers and fishermen used the area. Not much else. An itinerant bum, George Gill, piecemeal built a little shack under the trees, from odds and ends he collected over time.

     The shack remained a safe haven for him because the promontory was now its own little “Lost World.” Land fill cut it off from the rest of the canyon to build the railroad across it and then Highway 101. A “cattle underpass” was created underneath the landfill to let the mountain stream continue down the canyon to the coast. The rest of the coastline was steep sandstone cliffs. Only here could the beach be accessed. The surf echoes off the cliffs and sends sizzling sounds up the stream.  Dolphins lounge in the waters. A fisherman might be seen casting his line and, back then, a couple of surfers riding the curls.

     At the mouth of the stream, where it emptied into the rocks and sand, a narrow path led up into the understory of one side of the canyon. Here was George Gill’s shack. It was in a clearing, a crude rock campfire by it. A couple of other paths led from this dirt clearing to the stream.SBSsketchicon The rest of the area was hillside. It was covered with poppies, yellow flowers, brambles, grass. In one direction is a bluey sea and bright fleshy beach. The other direction is a verdant, forested garden. The best of both worlds. 

     But nobody was out surfing that day. Nor was anybody fishing. Yet someone must have been there who did not wish to be disturbed. Bobby and Linda never returned. Missing person reports were filed by her mother, Eva Edwards, and by Bobby’s father, “Hutch,” the next day, June 5. Nobody knew where they went. All of them only knew they went to the “beach.”

     By that night, Hutch Domingos had enough. He went with Leo Gnesa and his son, Lee, to scout Highway 101. They cruised past and continued south to Refugio Beach but could not see Bobby’s car. It was about the second time around that they noticed his car parked behind the trees in the median of 101. The Gnesa’s knew the area of the beach well. They would come here and fish. However, at night (it was around 9 p.m. now), it would be impossible to head down the hillside path. They turned around and went up toward “Gaviota,” which visibly really amounted to a restaurant, gas station and the Vista Del Mar School. There they found a CHP officer, Paul Schultz, writing a ticket. He accompanied them back. With Schultz’s single flashlight, young Lee (only 19 years old) led them down. The beach revealed nothing. Lee mentioned the shack. They went up the pathway and Schultz looked into the door of the shack. He closed it immediately.

     “You don’t want to look in there.”

     Lee nor the others saw anything.    

2008secondpromontory-copped

This conservation photo shows the area in question. We followed the inner path. It is little changed from 50 years ago. The picture at right traces the path in blue.  It is significant because we basically followed the same path Lee and Paul Schultz followed that night. The difference being we did not stomp through the heavy brush up to the underwood where the shack used to be. That pathway is long overgrown. We entered through the stream bed.

2008secondpromontory-cropped-marked-icon
sbbeachTC
sbclearing2-bmp
sbshackTC-bmp
DSC02227-50%-icon
DSC02109-50%-icon
DSC02228-50%-icon
DSC02115-50%-icon
DSC02119-50%-icon
DSC02120-50%-icon
DSC02116-50%-icon
DSC02143-50%-icon
Shackicon
DSC02145-50%-icon
DSC02274-50%-icon

   But from what little we do know today, the bodies of Bobby and Linda were in there. Accounts differ, but it seems certain that Bobby’s body had been dragged in face down. Linda’s body was on top of his, facing up. Either her swimsuit was ripped or cut at the breast (in the middle) or the crotch was cut out. Bobby had been shot 11 times (apparently all in the back) and Linda had been shot 8 times (possibly all in the back). The sheriffs searched the area and found 20 .22 caliber shell casings. Supposedly, they were found in the stream bed. What the sheriff meant by “stream” is a little nebulous. According to Lee, the stream couldn’t be walked back then. It was narrow and very overgrown. (But, then, when someone is chasing you with a gun, you do what you have to in order to get away.) However, coupled with another fact we should deduce the killer stood in the stream but perhaps Bobby and Linda were elsewhere.

     This important clue comes from Lee. He did not see any blood. None of them did. They walked across the sandy mouth of the stream in order to go up the path to the shack. It seems impossible that Schultz’s flashlight beam would not coast over blood, even inadvertently, as he shined it about. The path up to the shack was a narrow trail. Still, none of them saw blood. Lee reminded me they weren’t looking for it because they didn’t know what had happened. But still, in the dark the flashlight beam will be leading the way up the path. I find it hard to believe that blood would not be seen.

     In order to explain this, we have to accept there was no blood. Coupled with the report that the shell casings were found in the stream bed, we should deduce that  the killer must have been standing in the stream bed and perhaps from here he shot them both as they rushed back to the area of shack. He then drug their bodies up the remainder of one of these shorter paths (See sheriff’s sketch).

     Sheriff Webster said they had evidence that the killer reloaded. This statement seems inspired by the number of shell casings. 20 shots had been fired. 19 hit. 1 went wild. No magazine for a .22 caliber carried over 15 bullets. Most carried 10. The killer either shot 2 complete magazines worth into them or 1 and a half. It is hard to believe that someone who would pump 11 bullets into one man and 8 into a young woman is going to fire 1 and a half clips. It seems likely he had 10 round clips and emptied both into them and stopped only when the second clip emptied.

     This is significant. He didn’t shoot Bobby 10 times and then quickly reload and shot one more round in him and then chase Linda down and shoot at her 9 times and hit 8 times. He must have brought both down with the first clip and then got in close over them and shot them again with the second clip of ammunition. Incidentally, this would mean a shot from his first clip went wide.

     Speaking with Lee and Brian during our expedition down there, I have to agree with them. This much we know. Whoever killed them enjoyed doing it. This was overkill. There was no need to shoot them as many times as they were shot just to kill them.

     This presented the sheriffs with their big problem. Bobby was loved by all the world. That may sound like cliché from some cheap mystery detective movie, but art imitates life. Bobby was only 18. He had no enemies. He was indeed one of the most liked people you could imagine. Linda, too, was popular. She had also said, rather enigmatically, that “When I leave this world, I’m going to go out on the front page.” She did indeed, but no connection was found to indicate anybody who wanted to kill her.

     The topography of this remote area indicates that the killer did not follow them but that he was already there. This is supported by another discovery. Boxes of .22 caliber ammunition were discovered in the shack. Nobody walks down the grade that leads to the beach with boxes of ammo on them just to shoot people. The killer clearly had enough ammo in his clips. He was already there— either to shoot small game or birds or whatever. Interestingly, the ammo boxes bore no price tag. Coupled with the batch number they were either bought at a store in Santa Barbara or they were sold at Vandenburg AFB by someone who could get them before the PX could put a price tag on them. He was thus familiar enough with the county of Santa Barbara.

     Brian Donelson made it clear to me that Bobby would have fought to death to save himself and her. He may indeed have done so. Reports aren’t clear. He might have had a bruised face or swollen lip. Lee recalls being told that his right wrist was bruised, as if he punched into something really hard and the kickback bruised the wrist.

     The newspapers at the time said the sheriffs weren’t certain whether the weapon was an automatic pistol or a rifle. I personally suspect it was a pistol. A rifle is more cumbersome. Also, there is the more tangible mechanics of dragging bodies by the feet. Both hands must be used. You can’t drag a body by one leg. The other will act like a rudder and make it impossible. The killer would have to use both hands, one grabbing each ankle. He cannot have the gun in his hand. This argues that he slipped the pistol in his pocket or belt. If he had a rifle, it would mean he had a sling on it. If the killer had a rifle, I doubt he set it aside.

     The double murder, you see, is quite pondersome. One, it carries the signature of a vengeful maniac. On the other hand, this is essentially out in the boonies. No thrill killer thirsting for blood would go there on the odd chance a couple would come along. Then there’s the problem of hiding the bodies in the shack, an act which indicates the killer had to hide the product of his dirty deed. Why not just run? Could he not get away for a while? Was he trying to blame Gill? That would mean he was aware of his presence there off and on. The papers said that there was an attempt to light the shack on fire. Lee Gnesa doesn’t recall seeing any real evidence of this or even smelling any charring. This would have also set the whole of the “canyon” on fire and this would only have drawn attention to the killer as he fled. (A Santa Barbara News Press photo of the shack also shows that the reports of leaves being piled up around the shack to help ignite it is untrue.)

     The circumstances and the character of the victims all make this the genuinely motiveless crime. It doesn’t seem like thrill killing. Revenge is hard to imagine. Nobody even knew they were going to that section of beach.

     Because of this, 9 years later, The Zodiac Killer would be introduced into the equation.  He attacked young couples. He shot his first “official” victims in December 1968 at Lake Herman Road with a .22 automatic pistol. He attacked a couple at an isolated spot at Lake Berryessa in September 1969. Together, this makes a similar MO to what we see at Gaviota Beach. Could Bobby and Linda be his first victims? Sheriff John Carpenter wasn’t sure. He had inside information that Leigh Allen was a suspect. He discovered from Lompoc locals that Leigh Allen once kept a trailer down around Lompoc and was a lifeguard at the local public pool. He held a press conference and admitted there was no proof, but that on the surface there seemed a similar MO.

     Is there? Well, they were a couple shot more than necessary with a .22 caliber. But Zodiac also didn’t hide what he did. He simply left, on more than one occasion before the victims were even dead. He went for a single head shot on the man to get him out of the way first. Then he riddled the woman full of holes. It’s the opposite here. Bobby was shot the most. Perhaps it’s Zodiac, perhaps not. I needed more clues.

     On April 25, 2013, a little close to 1 month short of the 50th anniversary of the double murder, Lee Gnesa led me and Brian Donelson back to the site. We were probably the first ones there in 35 years. This pictures and videos that follow take up the narrative.    

DSC02221-50%-icon
DSC02102-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video10icon
DSC04496-50%-icon
DSC02059-50%-icon
DSC02106-50%-icon
DSC02099-50%-icon
DSC02105-50%-icon
DSC02245-50%-icon
DSC04419-50%-icon
DSC02101-50%-icon
DSC02248-50%-icon
DSC02120-50%-icon
DSC02229-50%-icon
DSC02225-50%-icon
videoplayericon
DSC04418-50%-icon
Video9icon
DSC02226-50%-icon
DSC02220-50%-icon
DSC02241-50%-icon
DSC02157-50%-icon
DSC02119-50%-icon
DSC02110-50%-icon
DSC02115-50%-icon
DSC02109-50%-icon
DSC02121-50%-icon
DSC02124-50%-icon
DSC02111-50%-icon
DSC02161-50%-icon
DSC02163-50%-icon
DSC02096-50%-icon
DSC04468-50%-icon
DSC02092-50%-icon
DSC02098-50%-icon
DSC02094-50%-icon
DSC02086-50%-icon
DSC02090-50%-icon
DSC02253-50%-icon
DSC02085-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video7icon
videoplayericon
Video6icon
DSC02282-50%-icon
DSC04406-50%-icon
DSC02288-50%-icon
DSC02293-50%-icon
DSC02069-50%-icon
DSC02192-50%-icon
DSC02198-50%-icon
DSC02202-50%-icon
DSC02279-50%-icon
DSC02074-50%-icon
DSC04490-50%-icon
DSC02278-50%-icon
DSC04411-50%-icon
DSC04412-50%-icon
DSC02271-50%-icon
DSC04413-50%-icon
DSC02255-50%-icon
DSC02258-50%-icon
DSC02259-50%-icon
DSC04411-cropped
DSC02130-50%-icon
DSC02127-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video13-icon
DSC04435-50%-icon
DSC02143-50%-icon
DSC02153-50%-icon
DSC02170-50%-icon
DSC02068-50%-icon
DSC04432-50%-icon
DSC02165-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video17icon
DSC02160-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video20icon
DSC02195-50%-icon
DSC02190-50%-icon
DSC02189-50%-icon
DSC02186-50%-icon
videoplayericon
Video19icon
videoplayericon
Video15icon
DSC02128-50%-icon
DSC02156-50%-icon
DSC02145-50%-icon
DSC02137-50%-icon
DSC02158-50%-icon
DSC02147-50%-icon
DSC02174-50%-icon
DSC04442-50%-icon
DSC04430-50%-icon
DSC04505-50%-icon DSC04504-50%-icon DSC04506-50%-icon DSC04511-50%-icon DSC04522-50%-icon

     The most significant find, of course, was the shoe. I took it home with me, along with the mesh and frame, and was able to do some research. It wasn’t difficult to identify the shoe.

   Lee was certainly right. It turned out to be a 1960s shoe. Specifically, it is a 1960s KEDS. The question is, was it Linda’s? If so, it couldn’t have been left where it was found. It was essentially found where the shack used to be. This would indicate that it had been thrown up the hill and with time, storms, winds, slides, it was buried, revealed, reburied, and came down the hill.  This would also mean that the killer threw their shoes up the hillside. It is unlikely it was to hide them. It would have been done to keep them from running away. This would mean he kept them tied for sometime or had them walk before him at gunpoint. Without shoes, there was little incentive to make a dash. This would also mean that he was busy doing something else, upon which they might have innocently intruded, and he simply couldn’t leave and leave them alive. This is, naturally, assuming that is her shoe.

     If the shoe is not hers, then it was lost sometime after the murder, for the sheriffs could hardly have missed it if it was lying about. It would also basically mean that whoever lost it, lost a very nice, little worn shoe and did so up the hillside where nobody walked. Or, the woman who lost it may have lost it a couple of decades later and simply was a horribly out of date person who wore 20 year old shoes. The area was still clear in the early 1970s. We don’t know when it became overgrown, but since it has become jungle it has never been cleared again. We were the first ones there in at least 35 years, and my pictures above constitute the only known pictures of the location of the shack since 1972.  

     It is it Linda’s shoe, the sheriffs didn’t check the hillside very well.

     The mesh, pre-cut into a triangle, is a little harder to trace. The frame seems to go with it, though not necessarily this particular piece of mesh. Lee was right. Water could never come that far up and wash a piece up from the stream.

    

DSC04518-50%-icon
DSC04508-50%-icon DSC04516-50%-icon DSC04517-50%-icon

   Altogether the crime scene reconstruction here tells us a number of things. Obviously, the killer had to know the location fairly well. Nothing indicates that he followed them down. Rather, he was already present. Although it was a brutal murder, the killer sought to hide evidence of his crime. This suggests he could not quickly escape the area.

     The contradictions this gives us are obvious and frustrating. If it was The Zodiac, he may have liked to hunt and fish out there, and something happened between he and Bobby that led to brutal murder. We know The Zodiac knew remote hunting and fishing locations. Such was Lake Herman Road, and nearby to this was the Humble Oil refinery which was under construction at the time of the “first” Zodiac murder in December 1968. Nearby to this Gaviota spot was the Texaco Oil Terminal Company, also undergoing various refits. If a thrill killer was involved, he my have been in construction and was someone who liked to also frequent hunting and fishing locations.

     If it was a serial thrill killer, why did he not strike again? Only one serial killer would have this same general MO, and that was The Zodiac Killer. Yet he would not strike for the “first” time until 5 years later, and do so, moreover, in the Bay Area of northern California. If this was someone other than Zodiac, why did he not strike again? He certainly enjoyed doing what he did.

     Things don’t entirely add up. What thrill killer sought to hide the evidence of his crime? The case still needs much more investigation and the details need to see the light of day.  Hiding the bodies . . .the need to hide the bodies . . .is key to it all.

Home

Q Files is not spontaneous extemporanea.
 It contains the results of 33 years of the author’s personal investigations of the unexplained.

About

More About

Why Q Files?

 Bermuda Triangle

Bigfoot

Cold Case Files

UFOs

Year of the Zodiac:

 Lake Herman Rd. 12-20-1968

 Blue Rock Springs 7-4-1969

 The Zodiac Speaks

 Lake Berryessa 9-27-1969

 San Francisco  10-11-1969

Gamester of Death:

 Poison Pen Pal

 The Kathleen Johns Incident

 Cheri Jo Bates

 Zodiac & The “Nightingale Murders”

On the Track of The Zodiac:

 Gaviota Revisited

 Gaviota Crime Scene Investigated

 Cracking the 340 Cipher

 Blue Rock Springs Reconstructed

 Blue Rock Springs: Silencer or Not?

 Benicia: Where the Cross Hairs Meet

 From Folklore to Fact: cases in detail

 The Zodiac Speaks: A Pattern

 Zodiac: profile

The Zodiac and Ray Davis

The Zodiac & San Diego

My Suspect:

 Steve

Popular Pages

Flight 19

EAR/ONS

The Witchcraft

Zodiac

Carolyn Coscio

Zodiaclogo402

The ascent up from the tracks

grip_footer_on42

“Gian has a real talent for finding the facts in our folklore. If you’re interested in the truth, his books are a must read.”
                                     —            Matt Jolley                   Edward R. Murrow Award for Journalism.

 “You have opened my eyes for the first really serious look at The Bermuda Triangle. I think that your book is, as you say the first of its kind in 25 years, and I think the best.

                                                           — Whitley Strieber.

  “The danger of Gian J. Quasar’s fascination with mysteries often assigned to ‘paranormal causes’ is that readers will assume his writing is tainted with secret advocacy and bias— like the majority of hacks who litter this field. Readers, rest easy. Quasar is a superb writer and researcher, and stands alone at the top of this unusual field. Through Quasar, the genre is elevated (finally!) to equal, even exceeds, the highest standards of investigative journalism, and he has the rare ability to distill complex data into lucid declarative sentences— I can give no higher praise.

— Randy Wayne Wright
 New York Times bestseller “Doc Ford” series.

“During a recent trip to New Mexico, I finally tackled Quasar's book and found it to be the best book I've ever read on this important subject. Quasar is a serious-minded researcher who, rather than sensationalizing or speculating in an irresponsible manner, reports the cold, hard facts.

— Andrew Griffin, the Town Talk, New Orleans.

“He’s bloody eccentric, an historian with no qualifications who sticks his nose into affairs and gets results.”

— an unnamed and undisclosed British TV producer.